>> It appears you have either not registered with the Welwyn Hatfield Forum or that you are not logged in. To register please click here ...

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Reminder! This forum is not the place to post general case work for your MP. If you have a specific problem that requires attention, then please use the contact form at http://www.shapps.com


Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Author Topic: Labour's dog insurance stealth tax  (Read 615 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Hi there reader
Do you find this message annoying?
Why not register and make a post to get rid of it?

GhostTown68

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 778
    • View Profile
Re: Labour's dog insurance stealth tax
« Reply #15 on: March 09, 2010, 09:32:48 PM »
I couldn't afford that amount each year.

Best remember that when you cast your vote (or before you abstain) at the forthcoming general election, then.

If 'dog insurance' forms the basis of your voting in May then god help us all.
Logged

George

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 575
    • View Profile
Re: Labour's dog insurance stealth tax
« Reply #16 on: March 09, 2010, 09:57:21 PM »
If 'dog insurance' forms the basis of your voting in May then god help us all.

Of course not! Even if it might cost you between £200 and £600 per year for dog insurance, perhaps one should consider the bigger picture. But can you ignore the other costs I mentioned above, like Council Tax, fuel duty and - another one - national insurance increases? I think of all these huge cost increases as akin to stealth taxes. How many people will ignore all this, taken together, and still vote Labour just because they've always voted Labour and, in their eyes, the party can do  no wrong?
Logged

Mighty Hatfield

  • Lifelong Super Hero Member
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 2961
  • Fighting hard for you.
    • View Profile
Re: Labour's dog insurance stealth tax
« Reply #17 on: March 09, 2010, 10:11:20 PM »
If 'dog insurance' forms the basis of your voting in May then god help us all.

Of course not! Even if it might cost you between £200 and £600 per year for dog insurance, perhaps one should consider the bigger picture. But can you ignore the other costs I mentioned above, like Council Tax, fuel duty and - another one - national insurance increases? I think of all these huge cost increases as akin to stealth taxes. How many people will ignore all this, taken together, and still vote Labour just because they've always voted Labour and, in their eyes, the party can do  no wrong?

how is an increase in council tax, or NI, a "stealth tax"?

Do you know what is meant by the term "stealth tax"?

Lets not forget, youve been blaming Gordon Brown for almost anything you could remotely link him to for the best part of a year, for instance clamping in the car park next to aldi. I have no problem with that, although it tends to skew the discussion on here somewhat. Just re-read this topic, some of us are talking dog insurance, and the issues that go with it, and all you are talking about is the government and who you will vote for. I think its a real shame.

After all, even the tories arent saying dog insurance is a bad idea, just that a solution is long overdue!

Logged

George

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 575
    • View Profile
Re: Labour's dog insurance stealth tax
« Reply #18 on: March 10, 2010, 09:25:01 AM »
how is an increase in council tax, or NI, a "stealth tax"?
Do you know what is meant by the term "stealth tax"?
Lets not forget, youve been blaming Gordon Brown for almost anything you could remotely link him to for the best part of a year, for instance clamping in the car park next to aldi. I have no problem with that, although it tends to skew the discussion on here somewhat. Just re-read this topic, some of us are talking dog insurance, and the issues that go with it, and all you are talking about is the government and who you will vote for. I think its a real shame.

I opened this thread and it features the terms 'dog insurance' and 'stealth tax'. How can I be 'off topic' given that I started the topic? I'm keen to answer your questions. Would you prefer me to go further into taxes and other money-rabbing schemes like dog insurance on this thread, or start a new thread?
Logged

disgruntled

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 780
    • View Profile
Re: Labour's dog insurance stealth tax
« Reply #19 on: March 10, 2010, 09:48:55 AM »
how is an increase in council tax, or NI, a "stealth tax"?
Do you know what is meant by the term "stealth tax"?
Lets not forget, youve been blaming Gordon Brown for almost anything you could remotely link him to for the best part of a year, for instance clamping in the car park next to aldi. I have no problem with that, although it tends to skew the discussion on here somewhat. Just re-read this topic, some of us are talking dog insurance, and the issues that go with it, and all you are talking about is the government and who you will vote for. I think its a real shame.

I opened this thread and it features the terms 'dog insurance' and 'stealth tax'. How can I be 'off topic' given that I started the topic? I'm keen to answer your questions. Would you prefer me to go further into taxes and other money-rabbing schemes like dog insurance on this thread, or start a new thread?

I would go for a new thread because I think Tax and Spend are THE critical issues in the forthecoming election.

Would be nice to stay away from rag top headlines though.
As soon as you start it George I am in. ;)
Logged

GhostTown68

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 778
    • View Profile
Re: Labour's dog insurance stealth tax
« Reply #20 on: March 10, 2010, 11:56:30 PM »
how is an increase in council tax, or NI, a "stealth tax"?
Do you know what is meant by the term "stealth tax"?
Lets not forget, youve been blaming Gordon Brown for almost anything you could remotely link him to for the best part of a year, for instance clamping in the car park next to aldi. I have no problem with that, although it tends to skew the discussion on here somewhat. Just re-read this topic, some of us are talking dog insurance, and the issues that go with it, and all you are talking about is the government and who you will vote for. I think its a real shame.

I opened this thread and it features the terms 'dog insurance' and 'stealth tax'. How can I be 'off topic' given that I started the topic? I'm keen to answer your questions. Would you prefer me to go further into taxes and other money-rabbing schemes like dog insurance on this thread, or start a new thread?

If we start threads does that mean we can use terminology however we wish, no matter how inaccurate?
Logged

Arthur

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 194
    • View Profile
Re: Labour's dog insurance stealth tax
« Reply #21 on: March 11, 2010, 04:05:54 PM »
Another stupid money making Idea from politicians, you pay a tax on all insurance and the insurance company pays tax on it's profits. So of course it is a winner for government.

Our politicians look at a problem and think, how can we make more money out of it.

Me, I'm just a working class plonker and the solution is simple, all dogs in a public space are muzzled, big fine if they are not. End of problem.

Arthur.
Logged

markwoods39

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 447
    • View Profile
Re: Labour's dog insurance stealth tax
« Reply #22 on: March 13, 2010, 07:00:27 PM »
Arthur I 100% agree with you,all dogs should be muzzled,INCL hunting dogs ::) after all they do stray into public spaces. Everyone is happy then,end of problem???
Logged

Arthur

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 194
    • View Profile
Re: Labour's dog insurance stealth tax
« Reply #23 on: March 14, 2010, 05:27:29 PM »
If the dogs are to drive the fox into a gun then fine by me as they don't need to bite, but I think hunters may not agree.

Arthur.
Logged

George

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 575
    • View Profile
Re: Labour's dog insurance stealth tax
« Reply #24 on: March 16, 2010, 06:35:43 PM »
I understand that Labour has now done a U-turn on their proposal to force all dog owners to take out expensive insurance. What a shambles. Wait until after the election, though. Heaven forbid if they get back in, they'll think of plenty of new ways of sucking money out of us.
Logged

mythoughts

  • Lifelong Super Hero Member
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3109
    • View Profile
Re: Labour's stupid dog plans bite the dust as common sense prevails
« Reply #25 on: March 16, 2010, 10:29:29 PM »
I understand that Labour has now done a U-turn on their proposal to force all dog owners to take out expensive insurance. What a shambles. Wait until after the election, though. Heaven forbid if they get back in, they'll think of plenty of new ways of sucking money out of us.


A massive U-Turn. Never underestimate the power of the huge majority of the UK's law-abiding dog-owners.
 
Now the Government should finally focus on the minority of scum that deliberately breed violent dogs and are involved in organising dog-fights.
 
These people are cruel, mindless idiots and inflict much pain. The RSPCA and police know who these groups are...give them both the proper powers to get rid of them and leave us that love and care for our laddies and lassies alone.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2010, 09:45:34 AM by mythoughts »
Logged

Please don't stitch us up with A&E closure

Mighty Hatfield

  • Lifelong Super Hero Member
  • *******
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 2961
  • Fighting hard for you.
    • View Profile
Re: Labour's dog insurance stealth tax
« Reply #26 on: March 17, 2010, 09:45:50 AM »
I understand that Labour has now done a U-turn on their proposal to force all dog owners to take out expensive insurance. What a shambles. Wait until after the election, though. Heaven forbid if they get back in, they'll think of plenty of new ways of sucking money out of us.

priceless.

Oh, er, it seems these 'ideas' may have been shevled, er, id better get on shapps and remark on how they will probably do something else to cost us money at some point, whilst making out its some sort of embarrasing u-turn for the government.

Logged

jonmorris

  • Super Hero Member
  • ******
  • Online Online
  • Gender: Male
  • Posts: 2180
    • View Profile
    • WWW
Re: Labour's dog insurance stealth tax
« Reply #27 on: March 17, 2010, 11:23:44 AM »
Did Grant actually say anything on this?

We all know that ALL parties will suggest policies and plans as 'ideas' and gauge the reaction; then go away and either quietly drop the idea or tweak it. If you employ good PR, you can say that you reacted to public opinion, or any number of other tricks.

The problem is, I think a lot of people are now wise to this - as well as suggesting something outrageous that gets loads of column inches in the press, while slipping out other press releases. The 'burying bad news' trick that was so embarrassingly exposed a few years back.

I am not specifically blaming Labour here; it seems to be one of the basic tricks of every Government here and abroad. There must be a handbook somewhere that says how to do it!
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »

 


Moderated by Grant Shapps and many others in the Welwyn Hatfield Forum Community.
Promoted by Benedict McAleenan on behalf of Grant Shapps, both of Maynard House, The Common, Hatfield, AL10 0NF.
Powered by SMF 2.0 Beta 4 | SMF © 2006–2008, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.298 seconds with 28 queries.