Incidentally, 2 or 3 yrs back Labour voted in a completely new allowance called the Communications Allowance. It's £10,000 per annum. Most Tories voted against it, but the government have the majority and it went through. We're pledged to scrap this allowance if we win power.
While still claiming £4,444 under it the meantime?
Some of what would have previously been posted into the Incidental Expenditure Provision now gets automatically posted into this communications allowance. In the year just reported that ate up 44% of that allowance, in the yr just gone, but yet to be reported, I've actually used even less of it. The key is reducing the available overall spend to MPs and that's why we're pledged to reduce the allowances, starting with the axing of this Communications Allowance and then reducing the number of MPs in the House of Commons too.
I'm just trying to understand this, Grant.
You've used £4,444 of an allowance you disapprove of, on the apparent basis that this would, under your proposed scheme, be classified as "Incidental Expenses Provision"?
I'm not sure how this works, because you've already spent above the maximum on your incidental expenses, even before £4,444 has been allocated to your communications allowance.
I'm certainly not suggesting you're breaking the rules, just querying why you spend £4,444 of public money on a scheme you disapprove of? Perhaps I'm missing something?